Equipotentials
Chapter 2 — Vector Calculus
An equipotential is a set of points where the electric potential \(V\) takes a single constant value. In 2D they are curves; in 3D they are surfaces. Sketching equipotentials together with field lines gives a complete picture of an electrostatic field — you can read off the direction of \(\vec{E}\) and estimate its magnitude just by looking.
Always perpendicular to field lines
Because \(\vec{E} = -\vec{\nabla} V\) and the gradient is perpendicular to level sets of \(V\), the electric field is always perpendicular to equipotentials. If \(\vec{E}\) had any component along an equipotential, moving along that direction would change \(V\), contradicting constancy. Equivalently: moving along an equipotential does no work on a test charge.
Spacing encodes field strength
If you draw equipotentials at evenly-spaced values of \(V\) (say every \(\Delta V = 1\text{ V}\)), the spacing between neighboring equipotentials tells you how strong \(\vec{E}\) is:
\[|\vec{E}| \approx \frac{\Delta V}{\Delta s},\]
where \(\Delta s\) is the perpendicular distance between adjacent equipotentials. Tightly packed equipotentials mean a strong field; widely spaced equipotentials mean a weak field.
Common examples
- Point charge: equipotentials are concentric spheres centered on the charge, since \(V(r) = kq/r\) depends only on \(r\).
- Uniform field \(\vec{E} = E_0\hat{z}\): \(V = -E_0 z + V_0\), so equipotentials are horizontal planes.
- Two opposite charges (dipole): equipotentials are lobes that close around each charge, with the \(V=0\) surface being the perpendicular bisector plane.
- Conductor in equilibrium: the entire conductor, surface and interior, is one big equipotential. (More in Chapter 3.)
Reading a diagram
Given a drawing with equipotentials labeled \(V_1 > V_2 > V_3\):
- The field points from higher to lower \(V\), perpendicular to the curves, crossing them orthogonally.
- Where equipotentials crowd together, \(|\vec{E}|\) is largest.
- At a saddle between equipotentials, the field points along the direction of steepest potential decrease.
Note: a diagram that just shows unlabeled equipotentials is ambiguous about whether \(\vec{E}\) points radially in or radially out — you need to know which way \(V\) is increasing.
Practice Problems
Hint
Solution
\(V = \text{const}\) means \(z = \text{const}\), so equipotentials are horizontal planes. \(\vec{E} = -\vec{\nabla} V = (0,0,E_0)\), perpendicular to the planes.
Answer: horizontal planes; \(\vec{E} = E_0\hat{z}\).
Hint
Solution
At a crossing, \(V\) would have two different values at the same point — impossible, since \(V\) is a single-valued scalar function of position.
Answer: different equipotentials can't cross because \(V\) at the intersection point would be ambiguous.
Hint
Solution
At \(P\): \(|\vec{E}_P| \approx 1/(0.2\times 10^{-3}) = 5000\) V/m. At \(Q\): \(|\vec{E}_Q| \approx 1/(1.0\times 10^{-3}) = 1000\) V/m.
Answer: \(|\vec{E}_P|\) is five times \(|\vec{E}_Q|\).
Hint
Solution
\(x^2+y^2 = c\) for \(c \ge 0\) are circles of radius \(\sqrt{c}\). \(\vec{E} = -\vec{\nabla} V = (-2x,-2y,0) = -2\vec{r}\) in the plane — radially inward, with magnitude growing linearly in \(r\).
Answer: concentric circles; \(\vec{E} = -2(x,y,0)\).
Hint
Solution
Equipotentials are lobed surfaces that close around each charge separately at small distances and distort into a dipole-like shape far away. The perpendicular bisector plane is the \(V=0\) equipotential: every point on it is equidistant from both charges, so the \(+q\) and \(-q\) contributions to \(V\) cancel exactly.
Answer: two sets of closed lobes around each charge, plus the \(V=0\) perpendicular bisector plane.